On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:06:31AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > Some of the xfsprogs utilities read the mount table via.
> > getmntent(3).
> >
> > The mount table may contain (almost always these days since
> > /etc/mtab is
> > symlinked to /proc/self/mounts) autofs mount entries. During
> > processing
> > of the mount table entries statfs(2) can be called on mount point
> > paths
> > which will trigger an automount if those entries are direct or
> > offset
> > autofs mount triggers (indirect autofs mounts aren't affected).
> >
> > This can be a problem when there are a lot of autofs direct or
> > offset
> > mounts because real mounts will be triggered when statfs(2) is
> > called.
> > This can be particularly bad if the triggered mounts are NFS mounts
> > and
> > the server is unavailable leading to lengthy boot times or worse.
> >
> > Simply ignoring autofs mount entries during getmentent(3)
> > traversals
> > avoids the statfs() call that triggers these mounts. If there are
> > automounted mounts (real mounts) at the time of reading the mount
> > table
> > these will still be seen in the list so they will be included if
> > that
> > actually matters to the reader.
> >
> > Recent glibc getmntent(3) can ignore autofs mounts but that
> > requires the
> > autofs user to configure autofs to use the "ignore" pseudo mount
> > option
> > for autofs mounts. But this isn't yet the autofs default (to
> > prevent
> > unexpected side effects) so that can't be used.
> >
> > The autofs direct and offset automount triggers are pseudo file
> > system
> > mounts and are more or less useless in terms on file system
> > information
> > so excluding them doesn't sacrifice useful file system information
> > either.
> >
> > Consequently excluding autofs mounts shouldn't have any adverse
> > side
> > effects.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fsr/xfs_fsr.c | 3 +++
> > libfrog/linux.c | 2 ++
> > libfrog/paths.c | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fsr/xfs_fsr.c b/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
> > index 77a10a1d..466ad9e4 100644
> > --- a/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
> > +++ b/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
> > @@ -323,6 +323,9 @@ initallfs(char *mtab)
> > while ((mnt = platform_mntent_next(&cursor)) != NULL) {
> > int rw = 0;
> >
> > + if (!strcmp(mnt->mnt_type, "autofs"))
> > + continue;
>
> Hmm... the libfrog changes look decent, but it strikes me as a
> little
> odd that we don't just make platform_mntent_next filter that out?
Perhaps, but is that a better idea?
Putting special case checks in the body of the loop stands out to
a reader but buried away in platform_mntent_next() it could easily
be missed by implicit assumptions about what platform_mntent_next()
should do.
As Eric pointed out there's an explicit check for an xfs fs right
below this in the body of the loop and even that wasn't enough to
get my attention ... but hey, more haste less speed ... ;)
Ian
>
> (Or I guess refactor fsr to use the fs table...)
>
> OTOH "Not _another_ herring^Wrefactor!"
>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --D
>
> > +
> > if (strcmp(mnt->mnt_type, MNTTYPE_XFS ) != 0 ||
> > stat(mnt->mnt_fsname, &sb) == -1 ||
> > !S_ISBLK(sb.st_mode))
> > diff --git a/libfrog/linux.c b/libfrog/linux.c
> > index 40a839d1..a45d99ab 100644
> > --- a/libfrog/linux.c
> > +++ b/libfrog/linux.c
> > @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ platform_check_mount(char *name, char *block,
> > struct stat *s, int flags)
> > * servers. So first, a simple check: does the "dev" start
> > with "/" ?
> > */
> > while ((mnt = getmntent(f)) != NULL) {
> > + if (!strcmp(mnt->mnt_type, "autofs"))
> > + continue;
> > if (mnt->mnt_fsname[0] != '/')
> > continue;
> > if (stat(mnt->mnt_dir, &mst) < 0)
> > diff --git a/libfrog/paths.c b/libfrog/paths.c
> > index 32737223..d6793764 100644
> > --- a/libfrog/paths.c
> > +++ b/libfrog/paths.c
> > @@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ fs_table_initialise_mounts(
> > return errno;
> >
> > while ((mnt = getmntent(mtp)) != NULL) {
> > + if (!strcmp(mnt->mnt_type, "autofs"))
> > + ^continue;
> > if (!realpath(mnt->mnt_dir, rmnt_dir))
> > continue;
> > if (!realpath(mnt->mnt_fsname, rmnt_fsname))
> >
> >
