Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: remove deprecated mount options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/24/20 12:26 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 07:07:46PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> ikeep/noikeep was a workaround for old DMAPI code which is no longer
>> relevant.
>>
>> attr2/noattr2 - is for controlling upgrade behaviour from fixed attribute
>> fork sizes in the inode (attr1) and dynamic attribute fork sizes (attr2).
>> mkfs has defaulted to setting attr2 since 2007, hence just about every
>> XFS filesystem out there in production right now uses attr2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst |  2 ++
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c                | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst
>> index f461d6c33534..413f68efccc0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst
>> @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ Deprecated Mount Options
>>  ===========================     ================
>>    Name				Removal Schedule
>>  ===========================     ================
>> +  ikeep/noikeep			TBD
>> +  attr2/noattr2			TBD
> 
> Er... what date did you have in mind?
> 
>>  ===========================     ================
>>  
>>  
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> index 71ac6c1cdc36..4c26b283b7d8 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> @@ -1234,25 +1234,12 @@ xfs_fc_parse_param(
>>  	case Opt_nouuid:
>>  		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_NOUUID;
>>  		return 0;
>> -	case Opt_ikeep:
>> -		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP;
>> -		return 0;
>> -	case Opt_noikeep:
>> -		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP;
>> -		return 0;
>>  	case Opt_largeio:
>>  		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_LARGEIO;
>>  		return 0;
>>  	case Opt_nolargeio:
>>  		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_LARGEIO;
>>  		return 0;
>> -	case Opt_attr2:
>> -		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_ATTR2;
>> -		return 0;
>> -	case Opt_noattr2:
>> -		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_ATTR2;
>> -		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_NOATTR2;
>> -		return 0;
>>  	case Opt_filestreams:
>>  		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_FILESTREAMS;
>>  		return 0;
>> @@ -1304,6 +1291,23 @@ xfs_fc_parse_param(
>>  		xfs_mount_set_dax_mode(mp, result.uint_32);
>>  		return 0;
>>  #endif
>> +	case Opt_ikeep:
>> +		xfs_warn(mp, "%s mount option is deprecated.", param->key);
>> +		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP;
> 
> It's a little odd that you didn't then remove these XFS_MOUNT_ flags.
> It's strange to declare a mount option deprecated but still have it
> change behavior.

but ... this doesn't change behavior, right?  The flag is still set.

I think it makes sense to announce deprecation, with a date set for future
removal, but keep all other behavior the same.  That gives people who still
need it (if any exist) time to complain, right?

> In this case, I guess we should keep ikeep/noikeep in the mount options
> table so that scripts won't fail, but then we remove XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP and
> change the codebase to always take the IKEEP behavior and delete the
> code that handled the !IKEEP behavior.
> 
>> +		return 0;
>> +	case Opt_noikeep:
>> +		xfs_warn(mp, "%s mount option is deprecated.", param->key);
>> +		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP;
>> +		return 0;
>> +	case Opt_attr2:
>> +		xfs_warn(mp, "%s mount option is deprecated.", param->key);
>> +		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_ATTR2;
> 
> If the kernel /does/ encounter an attr1 filesystem, what will it do now?

The same as it did yesterday; the flag is still set for now.

> IIRC the default (if there is no attr2/noattr2 mount option) is to
> auto-upgrade the fs, right?  So will we stop doing that, or are we
> making the upgrade mandatory now?
> 
>> +		return 0;
>> +	case Opt_noattr2:
>> +		xfs_warn(mp, "%s mount option is deprecated.", param->key);
>> +		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_ATTR2;
>> +		mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_NOATTR2;
> 
> Also, uh, why move these code hunks?

That's my fault, I had suggested moving all the deprecated options to the end.

Maybe with a comment, /* REMOVE ME 2089 */ or whatever we pick?

-Eric



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux