Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:49:53 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <160031335967.3624461.12775342036527430147.stgit@magnolia>
References: <160031334050.3624461.17900718410309670962.stgit@magnolia> <160031335967.3624461.12775342036527430147.stgit@magnolia>

>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(dfc, next, dfops_freezers, dfc_list) {
> -		error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0,
> -				0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> +		error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &dfc->dfc_tres, 0, 0,
> +				XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);

... and this fixes the weird itruncate thing.  Nice!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] xfs: fix how we deal with new intents during recovery
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining block reservation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] mkfs.xfs: fix ASSERT on too-small device with stripe geometry
Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux