Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: clean up bmap intent item recovery checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:29:30PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The bmap intent item checking code in xfs_bui_item_recover is spread all
> over the function.  We should check the recovered log item at the top
> before we allocate any resources or do anything else, so do that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c |   57 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
> index 0a0904a7650a..877afe76d76a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
> @@ -437,17 +437,13 @@ xfs_bui_item_recover(
>  	xfs_fsblock_t			inode_fsb;
>  	xfs_filblks_t			count;
>  	xfs_exntst_t			state;
> -	enum xfs_bmap_intent_type	type;
> -	bool				op_ok;
>  	unsigned int			bui_type;
>  	int				whichfork;
>  	int				error = 0;
>  
>  	/* Only one mapping operation per BUI... */
> -	if (buip->bui_format.bui_nextents != XFS_BUI_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
> -		xfs_bui_release(buip);
> -		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> -	}
> +	if (buip->bui_format.bui_nextents != XFS_BUI_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS)
> +		goto garbage;

We don't really need the xfs_bui_release any more, and can stick to
plain "return -EFSCORRUPTED" instead of the goto, but I suspect the
previous patch has taken care of that and you've rebased already?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux