On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:52:45AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:56:20PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Oops, sorry, I was reading the wrong VM report. It's overlayfs (atop > > xfs though I don't think that matters) that doesn't support FSGETXATTR > > on directories. > > I think we should overlayfs to support FSGETXATTR on all files that > can be opened instead. Heh, yes, that would be a better option. :) Even if they do add it, though, I still think we need to be able to _notrun this test to avoid failures on unpatched kernels? This also makes me wonder, we lose all the FSGETXATTR state on copy-up, don't we? Since the VFS doesn't have a primitive for cloning all the metadata? --D
