On 2020/9/17 2:45, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 07:19:10PM +0800, xiakaixu1987@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> We already do the crc verification before calling the xfs_attr3_rmt_verify()
>
> Nit: The function call you're removing does not itself do crc
> verification; it merely checks that the *crc feature* is set. This
> commit message needs to make this distinction, because at first I
> thought "Why would you remove crc verification?"
>
> IOWs...
>
> "We already check that the crc feature is enabled before calling
> xfs_attr3_rmt_verify(), so remove the redundant feature check in that
> function."
Yes, right! The original commit message is confusing, will update it
in the next version.
Thanks,
Kaixu
>
> --D
>
>> function, and just return directly for non-crc buffers, so don't need
>> to do the repeated crc verification in xfs_attr3_rmt_verify().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
>> index 3f80cede7406..48d8e9caf86f 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_remote.c
>> @@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ xfs_attr3_rmt_verify(
>> {
>> struct xfs_attr3_rmt_hdr *rmt = ptr;
>>
>> - if (!xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb))
>> - return __this_address;
>> if (!xfs_verify_magic(bp, rmt->rm_magic))
>> return __this_address;
>> if (!uuid_equal(&rmt->rm_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid))
>> --
>> 2.20.0
>>
--
kaixuxia
