Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the unnecessary variable error in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Darrick,

On 2020/9/17 0:45, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 07:19:09PM +0800, xiakaixu1987@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> We can do the assert directly for the return value of xfs_mod_fdblocks()
>> function, and the variable error is unnecessary, so remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 7 ++-----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> index d33d0ba6f3bd..caa207220e2c 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
>> @@ -573,7 +573,6 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
>>  	int64_t			rtxdelta = 0;
>>  	int64_t			idelta = 0;
>>  	int64_t			ifreedelta = 0;
>> -	int			error;
>>  
>>  	/* calculate deltas */
>>  	if (tp->t_blk_res > 0)
>> @@ -596,10 +595,8 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/* apply the per-cpu counters */
>> -	if (blkdelta) {
>> -		error = xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, blkdelta, rsvd);
>> -		ASSERT(!error);
>> -	}
>> +	if (blkdelta)
>> +		ASSERT(!xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, blkdelta, rsvd));
> 
> Um.... did you test this with ASSERTs disabled?  Because this compiles
> the free block counter update out of the function on non-debug kernels,
> which (AFAICT) will cause fs corruption...

Yes,thanks for pointing out... My fault...

> 
> --D
> 
>>  
>>  	if (idelta) {
>>  		percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_icount, idelta,
>> -- 
>> 2.20.0
>>

-- 
kaixuxia



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux