Re: [PATCH 10/11] xfs: trace timestamp limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] xfs: trace timestamp limits
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:10 +0100
Cc: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <159847956308.2601708.12409676822646276735.stgit@magnolia>
References: <159847949739.2601708.16579235017313836378.stgit@magnolia> <159847956308.2601708.12409676822646276735.stgit@magnolia>

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:06:03PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add a couple of tracepoints so that we can check the timestamp limits
> being set on inodes and quotas.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v4 00/11] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 10/11] xfs: trace timestamp limits
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/11] xfs: widen ondisk quota expiration timestamps to handle y2038+
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] generic: require discard zero behavior for dmlogwrites on XFS
Previous by thread: [PATCH 10/11] xfs: trace timestamp limits
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/11] xfs: trace timestamp limits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux