Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with sb_internal & fs_reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I find it really confusing that we record this in current->flags.
per-thread state makes total sense for not dipping into fs reclaim.
But for annotating something related to memory allocation passing flags
seems a lot more descriptive to me, as it is about particular locks.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux