Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: get rid of unnecessary xfs_perag_{get,put} pairs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 02:30:37AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:

...

> > 
> > Alternately-- if you want to sanity check that b_pag and the buffer
> > belong to the same ag, why not do that in xfs_buf_find for all the
> > buffers?
> 
> Since that modification doesn't relate to this patch though (since
> the purpose of this patch is not add ASSERT to xfs_buf_find).
> 
> If in that way, I think we can just kill all these ASSERTs.

Add some to the previous words:

What I really concern is to avoid introduce some regression from
this trivial patch. That is the original reason why I added these
assertions and tested with stress.

If some of these seems useful to the codebase, I could leave them
in this patch (since these are related to the modification of this
patch). Otherwise, I'd suggest kill them all though as I mentioned
earilier in the reply of v1.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux