From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
The bnobt and refcountbt scanners attempt to check that records are in
the correct order. However, the lastblock variable in both functions
ought to be set to the end of the previous record (instead of the start)
because otherwise we fail to catch overlapping records, which are not
allowed in either btree type.
Found by running xfs/410 with recs[1].blockcount = middlebit.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
repair/scan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/repair/scan.c b/repair/scan.c
index 1ddb5763..2d156d64 100644
--- a/repair/scan.c
+++ b/repair/scan.c
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ _("%s freespace btree block claimed (state %d), agno %d, bno %d, suspect %d\n"),
"out-of-order bno btree record %d (%u %u) block %u/%u\n"),
i, b, len, agno, bno);
} else {
- lastblock = b;
+ lastblock = end - 1;
}
} else {
agcnts->fdblocks += len;
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ _("extent (%u/%u) len %u claimed, state is %d\n"),
"out-of-order %s btree record %d (%u %u) block %u/%u\n"),
name, i, b, len, agno, bno);
} else {
- lastblock = b;
+ lastblock = end - 1;
}
/* Is this record mergeable with the last one? */
