On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:10:07PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 01:50:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Inode reclaim will still throttle direct reclaim on the per-ag > > reclaim locks. This is no longer necessary as reclaim can run > > non-blocking now. Hence we can remove these locks so that we don't > > arbitrarily block reclaimers just because there are more direct > > reclaimers than there are AGs. > > > > This can result in multiple reclaimers working on the same range of > > an AG, but this doesn't cause any apparent issues. Optimising the > > spread of concurrent reclaimers for best efficiency can be done in a > > future patchset. > > "Future patchset" as in "not in the 9 patches that I have left to read"? Yes. -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
