xfs: gut error handling in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb()
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
The error handling in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is largely
incorrect - rolling back the changes in the transaction if only one
counter underruns makes all the other counters incorrect. We still
allow the change to proceed and committing the transaction, except
now we have multiple incorrect counters instead of a single
underflow.
Further, we don't actually report the error to the caller, so this
is completely silent except on debug kernels that will assert on
failure before we even get to the rollback code. Hence this error
handling is broken, untested, and largely unnecessary complexity.
Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 170 +++++++++--------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 28b983ff8b113..4522ceaaf57ba 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -534,57 +534,9 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
sizeof(sbp->sb_frextents) - 1);
}
-STATIC int
-xfs_sb_mod8(
- uint8_t *field,
- int8_t delta)
-{
- int8_t counter = *field;
-
- counter += delta;
- if (counter < 0) {
- ASSERT(0);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- *field = counter;
- return 0;
-}
-
-STATIC int
-xfs_sb_mod32(
- uint32_t *field,
- int32_t delta)
-{
- int32_t counter = *field;
-
- counter += delta;
- if (counter < 0) {
- ASSERT(0);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- *field = counter;
- return 0;
-}
-
-STATIC int
-xfs_sb_mod64(
- uint64_t *field,
- int64_t delta)
-{
- int64_t counter = *field;
-
- counter += delta;
- if (counter < 0) {
- ASSERT(0);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- *field = counter;
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
- * xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is called to release unused reservations
- * and apply superblock counter changes to the in-core superblock. The
+ * xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is called to release unused reservations and
+ * apply superblock counter changes to the in-core superblock. The
* t_res_fdblocks_delta and t_res_frextents_delta fields are explicitly NOT
* applied to the in-core superblock. The idea is that that has already been
* done.
@@ -629,20 +581,17 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
/* apply the per-cpu counters */
if (blkdelta) {
error = xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, blkdelta, rsvd);
- if (error)
- goto out;
+ ASSERT(!error);
}
if (idelta) {
error = xfs_mod_icount(mp, idelta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_fdblocks;
+ ASSERT(!error);
}
if (ifreedelta) {
error = xfs_mod_ifree(mp, ifreedelta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_icount;
+ ASSERT(!error);
}
if (rtxdelta == 0 && !(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY))
@@ -650,95 +599,30 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
/* apply remaining deltas */
spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
- if (rtxdelta) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_frextents, rtxdelta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_ifree;
- }
-
- if (tp->t_dblocks_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, tp->t_dblocks_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_frextents;
- }
- if (tp->t_agcount_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_agcount, tp->t_agcount_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_dblocks;
- }
- if (tp->t_imaxpct_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod8(&mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct, tp->t_imaxpct_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_agcount;
- }
- if (tp->t_rextsize_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize,
- tp->t_rextsize_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_imaxpct;
- }
- if (tp->t_rbmblocks_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks,
- tp->t_rbmblocks_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_rextsize;
- }
- if (tp->t_rblocks_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks, tp->t_rblocks_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_rbmblocks;
- }
- if (tp->t_rextents_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextents,
- tp->t_rextents_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_rblocks;
- }
- if (tp->t_rextslog_delta != 0) {
- error = xfs_sb_mod8(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog,
- tp->t_rextslog_delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_undo_rextents;
- }
+ mp->m_sb.sb_frextents += rtxdelta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks += tp->t_dblocks_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_agcount += tp->t_agcount_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct += tp->t_imaxpct_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize += tp->t_rextsize_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks += tp->t_rbmblocks_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks += tp->t_rblocks_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_rextents += tp->t_rextents_delta;
+ mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog += tp->t_rextslog_delta;
spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
- return;
-out_undo_rextents:
- if (tp->t_rextents_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextents, -tp->t_rextents_delta);
-out_undo_rblocks:
- if (tp->t_rblocks_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks, -tp->t_rblocks_delta);
-out_undo_rbmblocks:
- if (tp->t_rbmblocks_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks, -tp->t_rbmblocks_delta);
-out_undo_rextsize:
- if (tp->t_rextsize_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, -tp->t_rextsize_delta);
-out_undo_imaxpct:
- if (tp->t_rextsize_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod8(&mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct, -tp->t_imaxpct_delta);
-out_undo_agcount:
- if (tp->t_agcount_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_agcount, -tp->t_agcount_delta);
-out_undo_dblocks:
- if (tp->t_dblocks_delta)
- xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, -tp->t_dblocks_delta);
-out_undo_frextents:
- if (rtxdelta)
- xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_frextents, -rtxdelta);
-out_undo_ifree:
- spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
- if (ifreedelta)
- xfs_mod_ifree(mp, -ifreedelta);
-out_undo_icount:
- if (idelta)
- xfs_mod_icount(mp, -idelta);
-out_undo_fdblocks:
- if (blkdelta)
- xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, -blkdelta, rsvd);
-out:
- ASSERT(error == 0);
+ /*
+ * Debug checks outside of the spinlock so they don't lock up the
+ * machine if they fail.
+ */
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_frextents >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_agcount >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextents >= 0);
+ ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog >= 0);
return;
}
