On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:49:14PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> XFS project quota treats project hierarchies as "mini filesysems" and
> so rather than -EDQUOT, the intent is to return -ENOSPC when a quota
> reservation fails, but this behavior is not consistent.
>
> The only place we make a decision between -EDQUOT and -ENOSPC
> returns based on quota type is in xfs_trans_dqresv().
>
> This behavior is currently controlled by whether or not the
> XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC flag gets passed into the quota reservation. However,
> its use is not consistent; paths such as xfs_create() and xfs_symlink()
> don't set the flag, so a reservation failure will return -EDQUOT for
> project quota reservation failures rather than -ENOSPC for these sorts
> of operations, even for project quota:
>
> # mkdir mnt/project
> # xfs_quota -x -c "project -s -p mnt/project 42" mnt
> # xfs_quota -x -c 'limit -p isoft=2 ihard=3 42' mnt
> # touch mnt/project/file{1,2,3}
> touch: cannot touch ‘mnt/project/file3’: Disk quota exceeded
>
> We can make this consistent by not requiring the flag to be set at the
> top of the callchain; instead we can simply test whether we are
> reserving a project quota with XFS_QM_ISPDQ in xfs_trans_dqresv and if
> so, return -ENOSPC for that failure. This removes the need for the
> XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC altogether and simplifies the code a fair bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Random thoughts on this patch and the previous one--
I like the part where these two patches actually make xfs consistent
about returning EDQUOT for user/group quota, and ENOSPC for project.
Annoyingly, it looks like f2fs/ext4 return EDQUOT for project quotas,
and fstests definitely trips a few regressions over the changing error
message.
So we have a bit of a mess wrt what the expected behavior is when you
run out of project quota. In theory XFS has precedence since it was
there first, though somewhat eroded due to the inconsistencies that
weren't fixed until now. OTOH, does that just mean ext4/f2fs are
broken?
What do others think? The patch submitter probably ought to start a
fsdevel thread about this. ;)
For the kernel patch, I'll say:
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h | 1 -
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 9 +++------
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
> index b2113b17e53c..56d9dd787e7b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
> @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ typedef uint16_t xfs_qwarncnt_t;
> #define XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES 0x0000010 /* ignore quota limits */
> #define XFS_QMOPT_SBVERSION 0x0000040 /* change superblock version num */
> #define XFS_QMOPT_GQUOTA 0x0002000 /* group dquot requested */
> -#define XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC 0x0004000 /* enospc instead of edquot (prj) */
>
> /*
> * flags to xfs_trans_mod_dquot to indicate which field needs to be
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> index c225691fad15..591779aa2fd0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> @@ -1808,7 +1808,7 @@ xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve(
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> uint64_t delblks;
> - unsigned int blkflags, prjflags = 0;
> + unsigned int blkflags;
> struct xfs_dquot *udq_unres = NULL;
> struct xfs_dquot *gdq_unres = NULL;
> struct xfs_dquot *pdq_unres = NULL;
> @@ -1849,7 +1849,6 @@ xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve(
>
> if (XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(ip->i_mount) && pdqp &&
> ip->i_d.di_projid != be32_to_cpu(pdqp->q_core.d_id)) {
> - prjflags = XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC;
> pdq_delblks = pdqp;
> if (delblks) {
> ASSERT(ip->i_pdquot);
> @@ -1859,8 +1858,7 @@ xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve(
>
> error = xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots(tp, ip->i_mount,
> udq_delblks, gdq_delblks, pdq_delblks,
> - ip->i_d.di_nblocks, 1,
> - flags | blkflags | prjflags);
> + ip->i_d.di_nblocks, 1, flags | blkflags);
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -1878,8 +1876,7 @@ xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve(
> ASSERT(udq_unres || gdq_unres || pdq_unres);
> error = xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots(NULL, ip->i_mount,
> udq_delblks, gdq_delblks, pdq_delblks,
> - (xfs_qcnt_t)delblks, 0,
> - flags | blkflags | prjflags);
> + (xfs_qcnt_t)delblks, 0, flags | blkflags);
> if (error)
> return error;
> xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots(NULL, ip->i_mount,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> index 2c3557a80e69..2c07897a3c37 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
>
> error_return:
> xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
> - if (flags & XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC)
> + if (XFS_QM_ISPDQ(dqp))
> return -ENOSPC;
> return -EDQUOT;
> }
> @@ -751,15 +751,13 @@ xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots(
> ASSERT(flags & XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK);
>
> if (udqp) {
> - error = xfs_trans_dqresv(tp, mp, udqp, nblks, ninos,
> - (flags & ~XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC));
> + error = xfs_trans_dqresv(tp, mp, udqp, nblks, ninos, flags);
> if (error)
> return error;
> }
>
> if (gdqp) {
> - error = xfs_trans_dqresv(tp, mp, gdqp, nblks, ninos,
> - (flags & ~XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC));
> + error = xfs_trans_dqresv(tp, mp, gdqp, nblks, ninos, flags);
> if (error)
> goto unwind_usr;
> }
> @@ -804,16 +802,12 @@ xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(
>
> if (!XFS_IS_QUOTA_RUNNING(mp) || !XFS_IS_QUOTA_ON(mp))
> return 0;
> - if (XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp))
> - flags |= XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC;
>
> ASSERT(!xfs_is_quota_inode(&mp->m_sb, ip->i_ino));
>
> ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> - ASSERT((flags & ~(XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES | XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC)) ==
> - XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_RTBLKS ||
> - (flags & ~(XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES | XFS_QMOPT_ENOSPC)) ==
> - XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_BLKS);
> + ASSERT((flags & ~(XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES)) == XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_RTBLKS ||
> + (flags & ~(XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES)) == XFS_TRANS_DQ_RES_BLKS);
>
> /*
> * Reserve nblks against these dquots, with trans as the mediator.
> --
> 2.17.0
>
