On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:53:20AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I was gonna say, I think we've messed this up enough that I think we > just have to accept empty attr leaf blocks. :/ > > I also think we should improve the ability to scan for and invalidate > incore buffers so that we can invalidate and truncate the attr fork > extents directly from an extent walk loop. It seems a little silly that > we have to walk the dabtree just to find out where multiblock remote > attr value structures might be hiding. The buffers are indexed by the physical block number. Unless you want to move to logical indexing that's what we'll need to do.
