On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 09:29:58AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> @@ -140,11 +140,24 @@ _("can't read %s block %u for inode %" PRIu64 "\n"),
> if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK &&
> (nodehdr.magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC ||
> nodehdr.magic == XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC)) {
> + int bad = 0;
> +
> if (i != -1) {
> do_warn(
> _("found non-root LEAFN node in inode %" PRIu64 " bno = %u\n"),
> da_cursor->ino, bno);
> + bad++;
> }
> +
> + /* corrupt leafn node; rebuild the dir. */
> + if (!bad &&
> + (bp->b_error == -EFSBADCRC ||
> + bp->b_error == -EFSCORRUPTED)) {
> + do_warn(
> +_("corrupt %s LEAFN block %u for inode %" PRIu64 "\n"),
> + FORKNAME(whichfork), bno, da_cursor->ino);
> + }
> +
So this doesn't really change any return value, but just the error
message. But looking at this code I wonder why we don't check
b_error first thing after reading the buffer, as checking the magic
for a corrupt buffer seems a little pointless.
