No need to have two variables for the AGFL block number array.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
repair/phase5.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/repair/phase5.c b/repair/phase5.c
index 17b57448..677297fe 100644
--- a/repair/phase5.c
+++ b/repair/phase5.c
@@ -2149,18 +2149,15 @@ build_agf_agfl(
/* setting to 0xff results in initialisation to NULLAGBLOCK */
memset(agfl, 0xff, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize);
+ freelist = xfs_buf_to_agfl_bno(agfl_buf);
if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
- __be32 *agfl_bno = xfs_buf_to_agfl_bno(agfl_buf);
-
agfl->agfl_magicnum = cpu_to_be32(XFS_AGFL_MAGIC);
agfl->agfl_seqno = cpu_to_be32(agno);
platform_uuid_copy(&agfl->agfl_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid);
for (i = 0; i < libxfs_agfl_size(mp); i++)
- agfl_bno[i] = cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK);
+ freelist[i] = cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK);
}
- freelist = xfs_buf_to_agfl_bno(agfl_buf);
-
/*
* do we have left-over blocks in the btree cursors that should
* be used to fill the AGFL?
--
2.26.2
