[PATCH] fs: xfs: fix a possible data race in xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We find that xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag() and xfs_reclaim_inode() are
concurrently executed at runtime in the following call contexts:

Thread1:
  xfs_fs_put_super()
    xfs_unmountfs()
      xfs_rtunmount_inodes()
        xfs_irele()
          xfs_fs_destroy_inode()
            xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag()

Thread2:
  xfs_reclaim_worker()
    xfs_reclaim_inodes()
      xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag()
        xfs_reclaim_inode()

In xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag():
  pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
  ...
  spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);

In xfs_reclaim_inode():
  spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
  ...
  ip->i_ino = 0;
  spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);

Thus, a data race can occur for ip->i_ino.

To fix this data race, the spinlock ip->i_flags_lock is used to protect
the access to ip->i_ino in xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag().

This data race is found by our concurrency fuzzer.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 8bf1d15be3f6..a2de08222ff5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -229,9 +229,9 @@ xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
 	struct xfs_perag	*pag;
 
+	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 	pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
 	spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 
 	radix_tree_tag_set(&pag->pag_ici_root, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino),
 			   XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux