Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs/126: make sure we corrupt the attr leaf in a detectable way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 04:31:24PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Try harder to fuzz the attr leaf so this consistently trips a verifier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

DOH, NAK on this one, you might as well take "xfs/126: make blocktrash
work reliably on attrleaf blocks" from Anthony Iliopoulos.

--D

> ---
>  tests/xfs/126 |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/126 b/tests/xfs/126
> index 4f9f8cf9..0d497779 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/126
> +++ b/tests/xfs/126
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ echo "+ corrupt xattr"
>  loff=1
>  while true; do
>  	_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode ${inode}" -c "ablock ${loff}" -c "stack" | grep -q 'file attr block is unmapped' && break
> -	_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode ${inode}" -c "ablock ${loff}" -c "stack" -c "blocktrash -x 32 -y $((blksz * 8)) -z ${FUZZ_ARGS}" >> $seqres.full
> +	_scratch_xfs_db -x -c "inode ${inode}" -c "ablock ${loff}" -c "stack" -c "blocktrash -x 4096 -y $((blksz * 8)) -z ${FUZZ_ARGS}" >> $seqres.full
>  	loff="$((loff + 1))"
>  done
>  
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux