Re: [PATCH] xfs: simplify the flags setting in xfs_qm_scall_quotaon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 09:09:57AM +0800, kaixuxia wrote:
> 
> On 2020/4/10 22:51, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 04:57:04PM +0800, xiakaixu1987@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Simplify the setting of the flags value, and only consider
> >> quota enforcement stuff here.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> >> index 5d5ac65..944486f 100644
> >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> >> @@ -357,11 +357,11 @@
> > 
> > No idea which function this is.  diff -p, please.
> 
> Yeah, the changed function is xfs_qm_scall_quotaon().
> Anyway, the result of diff -p as follows,

That was a request to generate your patches with diff -Naurp.

--D

> *** fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c	Sat Apr 11 08:32:03 2020
> --- /tmp/xfs_qm_syscalls.c	Sat Apr 11 08:31:51 2020
> *************** xfs_qm_scall_quotaon(
> *** 357,367 ****
>   	int		error;
>   	uint		qf;
>   
>   	/*
> ! 	 * Switching on quota accounting must be done at mount time,
> ! 	 * only consider quota enforcement stuff here.
>   	 */
> ! 	flags &= XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ENFD;
>   
>   	if (flags == 0) {
>   		xfs_debug(mp, "%s: zero flags, m_qflags=%x",
> --- 357,367 ----
>   	int		error;
>   	uint		qf;
>   
> + 	flags &= (XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ACCT | XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ENFD);
>   	/*
> ! 	 * Switching on quota accounting must be done at mount time.
>   	 */
> ! 	flags &= ~(XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ACCT);
>   
>   	if (flags == 0) {
>   		xfs_debug(mp, "%s: zero flags, m_qflags=%x",
> 
> > 
> > Also, please consider putting all these minor cleanups into a single
> > patchset, it's a lot easier (for me) to track and land one series than
> > it is to handle a steady trickle of single patches.
> Yeah, got it. Should I resend all of the patches that have been
> reviewed or just resend the last two patches with a single patchset?
> 
> The patches that have been reviewed as follows,
> xfs: trace quota allocations for all quota types
> xfs: combine two if statements with same condition
> xfs: check if reserved free disk blocks is needed
> xfs: remove unnecessary variable udqp from xfs_ioctl_setattr
> 
> The last two patches that have not been reviewed as follow,
> xfs: remove unnecessary assertion from xfs_qm_vop_create_dqattach
> xfs: simplify the flags setting in xfs_qm_scall_quotaon
> 
> > 
> > --D
> > 
> >>  	int		error;
> >>  	uint		qf;
> >>  
> >> -	flags &= (XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ACCT | XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ENFD);
> >>  	/*
> >> -	 * Switching on quota accounting must be done at mount time.
> >> +	 * Switching on quota accounting must be done at mount time,
> >> +	 * only consider quota enforcement stuff here.
> >>  	 */
> >> -	flags &= ~(XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ACCT);
> >> +	flags &= XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ENFD;
> >>  
> >>  	if (flags == 0) {
> >>  		xfs_debug(mp, "%s: zero flags, m_qflags=%x",
> >> -- 
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
> 
> -- 
> kaixuxia



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux