Re: xfs_check vs. xfs_repair vs. the world^W^Wfstests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:23:21AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > Not sure what to do about quota in repair -- we could build in the
> > ability to do quota counts since we scan the whole inode table and
> > directory tree anyway.  From there it's not so hard to rebuild the quota
> > inodes too.
> >
> 
> I will take up this work and get it completed.
> 
> Since I have other higher priority tasks at work place, I will have this as my
> secondary focus. Meanwhile, until it gets done, can we disable running these
> tests on block size > 4k i.e. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11454399/.

I still think even with the above outstanding issues we should not
run check by default.  We can still opt into it, but check extends
the run time of xfstests for not very good reasons.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux