On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:17:01AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a couple more small fixes that fell out of the auto relog work.
> The dquot issue is actually a deadlock vector if we randomly relog dquot
> buffers (which is only done for test purposes), but I figure we should
> handle dquot buffers similar to how inode buffers are handled. Thoughts,
> reviews, flames appreciated.
Oops, I missed this one, will review now...
Do you think there needs to be an explicit testcase for this? Or are
the current generic/{388,475} good enough? I'm pretty sure I've seen
this exact deadlock on them every now and again, so we're probably
covered.
--D
> Brian
>
> Brian Foster (2):
> xfs: trylock underlying buffer on dquot flush
> xfs: return locked status of inode buffer on xfsaild push
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c | 6 +++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c | 3 ++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 3 ++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.1
>
