On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:00:28PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 08:24:43PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Validate the geometry of the realtime geometry when we mount the > > filesystem, so that we don't abruptly shut down the filesystem later on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c > > index 2f60fc3c99a0..dee0a1a594dc 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c > > @@ -328,6 +328,41 @@ xfs_validate_sb_common( > > return -EFSCORRUPTED; > > } > > > > + /* Validate the realtime geometry; stolen from xfs_repair */ > > + if (unlikely( > > + sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize > XFS_MAX_RTEXTSIZE || > > Whacky whitespace before the || > > > + sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_RTEXTSIZE)) { > > + xfs_notice(mp, > > + "realtime extent sanity check failed"); > > + return -EFSCORRUPTED; > > + } > > We really don't need unlikely() in code like this. the compiler > already considers code that returns inside an if statement as > "unlikely" because it's the typical error handling pattern, for > cases like this it really isn't necessary. > > > > + > > + if (sbp->sb_rblocks == 0) { > > + if (unlikely( > > + sbp->sb_rextents != 0 || > > + sbp->sb_rbmblocks != 0 || > > + sbp->sb_rextslog != 0 || > > + sbp->sb_frextents != 0)) { > > Ditto on the unlikely and the whitespace. That code looks weird... > > if (sbp->sb_rextents || sbp->sb_rbmblocks || > sbp->sb_rextslog || sbp->sb_frextents) { > > > + xfs_notice(mp, > > + "realtime zeroed geometry sanity check failed"); > > + return -EFSCORRUPTED; > > + } > > + } else { > > + xfs_rtblock_t rexts; > > + uint32_t temp; > > + > > + rexts = div_u64_rem(sbp->sb_rblocks, sbp->sb_rextsize, &temp); > > + if (unlikely( > > + rexts != sbp->sb_rextents || > > + sbp->sb_rextslog != xfs_highbit32(sbp->sb_rextents) || > > And again. > > At least you're consistent, Darrick :) Copy-pastaing the weird style of the rest of that function. :) I'll fix it & resend. --D > -Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx