Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: validate the realtime geometry in xfs_validate_sb_common

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:00:28PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 08:24:43PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Validate the geometry of the realtime geometry when we mount the
> > filesystem, so that we don't abruptly shut down the filesystem later on.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > index 2f60fc3c99a0..dee0a1a594dc 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > @@ -328,6 +328,41 @@ xfs_validate_sb_common(
> >  		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/* Validate the realtime geometry; stolen from xfs_repair */
> > +	if (unlikely(
> > +	    sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize > XFS_MAX_RTEXTSIZE	||
> 
> Whacky whitespace before the ||
> 
> > +	    sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_RTEXTSIZE)) {
> > +		xfs_notice(mp,
> > +			"realtime extent sanity check failed");
> > +		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > +	}
> 
> We really don't need unlikely() in code like this. the compiler
> already considers code that returns inside an if statement as
> "unlikely" because it's the typical error handling pattern, for
> cases like this it really isn't necessary.
> 
> 
> > +
> > +	if (sbp->sb_rblocks == 0) {
> > +		if (unlikely(
> > +		    sbp->sb_rextents != 0				||
> > +		    sbp->sb_rbmblocks != 0				||
> > +		    sbp->sb_rextslog != 0				||
> > +		    sbp->sb_frextents != 0)) {
> 
> Ditto on the unlikely and the whitespace. That code looks weird...
> 
> 		if (sbp->sb_rextents || sbp->sb_rbmblocks ||
> 		    sbp->sb_rextslog || sbp->sb_frextents) {
> 
> > +			xfs_notice(mp,
> > +				"realtime zeroed geometry sanity check failed");
> > +			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > +		}
> > +	} else {
> > +		xfs_rtblock_t	rexts;
> > +		uint32_t	temp;
> > +
> > +		rexts = div_u64_rem(sbp->sb_rblocks, sbp->sb_rextsize, &temp);
> > +		if (unlikely(
> > +		    rexts != sbp->sb_rextents				||
> > +		    sbp->sb_rextslog != xfs_highbit32(sbp->sb_rextents)	||
> 
> And again.
> 
> At least you're consistent, Darrick :)

Copy-pastaing the weird style of the rest of that function. :)

I'll fix it & resend.

--D

> -Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux