Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: always init fdblocks in mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:22:33AM +0800, zhengbin (A) wrote:
> 
> On 2020/3/16 23:13, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 09:07:07PM +0800, Zheng Bin wrote:
> >> Use fuzz(hydra) to test XFS and automatically generate
> >> tmp.img(XFS v5 format, but some metadata is wrong)
> >>
> >> xfs_repair information(just one AG):
> >> agf_freeblks 0, counted 3224 in ag 0
> >> agf_longest 0, counted 3224 in ag 0
> >> sb_fdblocks 3228, counted 3224
> >>
> >> Test as follows:
> >> mount tmp.img tmpdir
> >> cp file1M tmpdir
> >> sync
> >>
> >> In 4.19-stable, sync will stuck, while in linux-next, sync not stuck.
> >> The reason is same to commit d0c7feaf8767
> >> ("xfs: add agf freeblocks verify in xfs_agf_verify"), cause agf_longest
> >> is 0, we can not block this in xfs_agf_verify.
> > Uh.... what are you saying here?  That the allocator misbehaves and
> > loops forever if sb_fdblocks > sum(agf_freeblks) after mount?
> >
> > Also, uh, what do you mean by "sync not stuck"?  Writeback will fail on
> > allocation error, right...?  So I think the problem with incorrect AGF
> > contents (on upstream) is that writeback will fail due to ENOSPC, which
> > should never happen under normal circumstance?
> >
> >> Make sure fdblocks is always inited in mount(also init ifree, icount).
> >>
> >> xfs_mountfs
> >>   xfs_check_summary_counts
> >>     xfs_initialize_perag_data
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 33 ---------------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 33 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> >> index c5513e5..dc41801 100644
> >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> >> @@ -594,39 +594,6 @@ xfs_check_summary_counts(
> >>  		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> >>  	}
> >>
> >> -	/*
> >> -	 * Now the log is mounted, we know if it was an unclean shutdown or
> >> -	 * not. If it was, with the first phase of recovery has completed, we
> >> -	 * have consistent AG blocks on disk. We have not recovered EFIs yet,
> >> -	 * but they are recovered transactionally in the second recovery phase
> >> -	 * later.
> >> -	 *
> >> -	 * If the log was clean when we mounted, we can check the summary
> >> -	 * counters.  If any of them are obviously incorrect, we can recompute
> >> -	 * them from the AGF headers in the next step.
> >> -	 */
> >> -	if (XFS_LAST_UNMOUNT_WAS_CLEAN(mp) &&
> >> -	    (mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
> >> -	     !xfs_verify_icount(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_icount) ||
> >> -	     mp->m_sb.sb_ifree > mp->m_sb.sb_icount))
> >> -		xfs_fs_mark_sick(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS);
> >> -
> >> -	/*
> >> -	 * We can safely re-initialise incore superblock counters from the
> >> -	 * per-ag data. These may not be correct if the filesystem was not
> >> -	 * cleanly unmounted, so we waited for recovery to finish before doing
> >> -	 * this.
> >> -	 *
> >> -	 * If the filesystem was cleanly unmounted or the previous check did
> >> -	 * not flag anything weird, then we can trust the values in the
> >> -	 * superblock to be correct and we don't need to do anything here.
> >> -	 * Otherwise, recalculate the summary counters.
> >> -	 */
> >> -	if ((!xfs_sb_version_haslazysbcount(&mp->m_sb) ||
> >> -	     XFS_LAST_UNMOUNT_WAS_CLEAN(mp)) &&
> >> -	    !xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS))
> >> -		return 0;
> >> -
> >>  	return xfs_initialize_perag_data(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
> > The downside of this is that now we /always/ have to make two trips
> > around all of the AGs at mount time.  If you're proposing to require a
> > fresh fdblocks recomputation at mount, could you please refactor all of
> > the mount-time AG walks into a single loop?  And perhaps use xfs_pwork
> > so that we don't have to do it serially?
> xfs_mountfs
>   xfs_initialize_perag         -->just alloc memory
>   xfs_check_summary_counts
>     xfs_initialize_perag_data  -->read agf,agi from disk
>       for (index = 0; index < agcount; index++)
>         error = xfs_alloc_pagf_init(mp, NULL, index, 0)
>         error = xfs_ialloc_pagi_init(mp, NULL, index)
>   xfs_fs_reserve_ag_blocks
>     for (agno = 0; agno < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; agno++)
>       xfs_ag_resv_init
>         #ifdef DEBUG  -->read agf
>           error = xfs_alloc_pagf_init(pag->pag_mount, tp, pag->pag_agno, 0)
>         #endif
> 
> Is this? if enable XFS_DEBUG, xfs_initialize_perag_data read agf, xfs_ag_resv_init
> 
> also read agf?

Yes, that's the other AG-walker that I was referring to.

--D

> 
> >
> > --D
> >
> >>  }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> > .
> >
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux