On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:47:10PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In e7ee96dfb8c26, we converted all ITER_ABORT users to use ECANCELED
> instead, but we forgot to teach xfs_rmap_has_other_keys not to return
> that magic value to callers. Fix it now.
>
> Fixes: e7ee96dfb8c26 ("xfs: remove all *_ITER_ABORT values")
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
/me had to go look at that commit to see what this was fixing.
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c
> index ff9412f113c4..dae1a2bf28eb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c
> @@ -2694,7 +2694,6 @@ struct xfs_rmap_key_state {
> uint64_t owner;
> uint64_t offset;
> unsigned int flags;
> - bool has_rmap;
> };
>
> /* For each rmap given, figure out if it doesn't match the key we want. */
> @@ -2709,7 +2708,6 @@ xfs_rmap_has_other_keys_helper(
> if (rks->owner == rec->rm_owner && rks->offset == rec->rm_offset &&
> ((rks->flags & rec->rm_flags) & XFS_RMAP_KEY_FLAGS) == rks->flags)
> return 0;
> - rks->has_rmap = true;
> return -ECANCELED;
> }
>
> @@ -2731,7 +2729,7 @@ xfs_rmap_has_other_keys(
> int error;
>
> xfs_owner_info_unpack(oinfo, &rks.owner, &rks.offset, &rks.flags);
> - rks.has_rmap = false;
> + *has_rmap = false;
>
> low.rm_startblock = bno;
> memset(&high, 0xFF, sizeof(high));
> @@ -2739,11 +2737,12 @@ xfs_rmap_has_other_keys(
>
> error = xfs_rmap_query_range(cur, &low, &high,
> xfs_rmap_has_other_keys_helper, &rks);
> - if (error < 0)
> - return error;
> + if (error == -ECANCELED) {
> + *has_rmap = true;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - *has_rmap = rks.has_rmap;
> - return 0;
> + return error;
> }
Ok, so there's two things here. The first is catching ECANCELED and
returning the correct value(0). The second is we no longer need the
rks.has_rmap member to be passed to the helper, because -ECANCELED
indicates that we found an rmap.
Ok, makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
