On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:29:01PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 12:45:31PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Just the defines of the new names - the conversion will be in > > scripted commits after this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h > > index 3eff7c321d43..bd5a2bfca64e 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h > > @@ -224,6 +224,8 @@ typedef struct xfs_btree_cur > > #define XFS_BTCUR_BPRV_INVALID_OWNER (1<<1) /* for ext swap */ > > } b; > > } bc_private; /* per-btree type data */ > > +#define bc_ag bc_private.a > > +#define bc_bt bc_private.b > > Hm. I get that the historical meaning of "b" was for "bmbt", but it's > not a great descriptor since the fields in bc_private.b are really for > inode-rooted btrees, of which the bmbt is currently the only user. If > we ever get around to adding the realtime rmapbt, then "bc_bt" is going > to seem a bit anachronistic. > > bc_ino, perhaps? Sure, makes no difference to me. It's just a case of running sed over all the patches before I rebase the series... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
