Re: [PATCH v7 04/19] xfs: Check for -ENOATTR or -EEXIST

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:05:56PM -0700, Allison Collins wrote:
> Delayed operations cannot return error codes.  So we must check for these conditions
> first before starting set or remove operations
> 
> Signed-off-by: Allison Collins <allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index 2255060..a2f812f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,14 @@ xfs_attr_set(
>  		goto out_trans_cancel;
>  
>  	xfs_trans_ijoin(args.trans, dp, 0);
> +
> +	error = xfs_has_attr(&args);
> +	if (error == -EEXIST && (name->type & ATTR_CREATE))
> +		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +
> +	if (error == -ENOATTR && (name->type & ATTR_REPLACE))
> +		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +

So xfs_has_attr() calls the format-specific variant for the attr fork.
If it's node format, xfs_attr_node_hasname() allocs a state and only
frees it if the lookup happens to fail. That looks like a potential
memory leak... Perhaps that helper should free the state in any case the
caller doesn't ask for a pointer?

Brian

>  	error = xfs_attr_set_args(&args);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_trans_cancel;
> @@ -525,6 +533,10 @@ xfs_attr_remove(
>  	 */
>  	xfs_trans_ijoin(args.trans, dp, 0);
>  
> +	error = xfs_has_attr(&args);
> +	if (error != -EEXIST)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	error = xfs_attr_remove_args(&args);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux