On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:06:32PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> The test currently assumes a file system block size of 4k. It will
> work just fine on any user-specified block size, though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/xfs/300 | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300
> index 28608b81..4f1c927a 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/300
> +++ b/tests/xfs/300
> @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 0 4096" $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals >> $seqres.full
> cat $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals | attr -s name $SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>
> # Fragment the file by writing backwards
> +bs=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> for I in `seq 6 -1 0`; do
> - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=4k \
> + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=${bs} \
Although the original case won't fail on 64k test. But this change makes
more sense.
Thanks,
Zorro
> oflag=direct count=1 conv=notrunc >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> done
>
> --
> 2.19.1
>
