On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 08:52:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > xfs_force_shutdown() will does nothing if the iclog at the head of > the log->iclog list is marked with XLOG_STATE_IOERROR before IO is > submitted. In general, that is the case here as the head iclog is > what xlog_state_get_iclog_space() returns. > > i.e. XLOG_STATE_IOERROR here implies the log has already been shut > down because the state is IOERROR rather than ACTIVE or WANT_SYNC as > was set when the iclog was obtained from > xlog_state_get_iclog_space(). > > > + if (iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_IOERROR) > > + goto error; > > > > if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&iclog->ic_refcnt, &log->l_icloglock)) { > > + if (iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_IOERROR) { > > + spin_unlock(&log->l_icloglock); > > + goto error; > > + } > > sync = __xlog_state_release_iclog(log, iclog); > > spin_unlock(&log->l_icloglock); > > if (sync) > > xlog_sync(log, iclog); > > } > > return 0; > > +error: > > + xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR); > > + return -EIO; > > Hence I suspect that this should be ASSERT(XLOG_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(log)) > just like is in xfs_log_force_umount() when this pre-existing log > IO error condition is tripped over... Indeed, the xfs_force_shutdown is a no-op both for the old and this new check. Now the real question, which is a bit out of scope for this patch is why we even have XLOG_STATE_IOERROR? Wouldn't it make more sense to just user the shutdown flag in the mount structure and avoid the extra state complexity and thus clean up this whole mess?