On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:18 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:05:00PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [..] > > > > attempts to minimize software cache effects for both I/O and > > > > memory mappings of this file. It requires a file system which > > > > has been configured to support DAX. > > > > > > > > DAX generally assumes all accesses are via cpu load / store > > > > instructions which can minimize overhead for small accesses, but > > > > may adversely affect cpu utilization for large transfers. > > > > > > > > File I/O is done directly to/from user-space buffers and memory > > > > mapped I/O may be performed with direct memory mappings that > > > > bypass kernel page cache. > > > > > > > > While the DAX property tends to result in data being transferred > > > > synchronously, it does not give the same guarantees of > > > > synchronous I/O where data and the necessary metadata are > > > > transferred together. > > > > > > (I'm frankly not sure that synchronous I/O actually guarantees that the > > > metadata has hit stable storage...) > > > > Oh? That text was motivated by the open(2) man page description of O_SYNC. > > Eh, that's just me being cynical about software. Yes, the O_SYNC docs > say that data+metadata are supposed to happen; that's good enough for > another section in the man pages. :) > Ah ok, yes, "all storage is a lie".
