On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:54:02AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> While the flags field in the ABI and the on-disk format allows for
> multiple namespace flags, that is a logically invalid combination that
> scrub complains about. Reject it at the ioctl level, as all other
> interface already get this right at higher levels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Looks ok I think. We never have attrs in two namespaces at once...
assuming that "attr_multi(3)" is the right manpage for all this?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 5 +++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 2f76d0a7b818..f3a53e0db2cf 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -462,6 +462,11 @@ xfs_attrmulti_by_handle(
>
> error = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < am_hreq.opcount; i++) {
> + if ((ops[i].am_flags & ATTR_ROOT) &&
> + (ops[i].am_flags & ATTR_SECURE)) {
> + ops[i].am_error = -EINVAL;
> + continue;
> + }
> ops[i].am_flags &= ATTR_KERNEL_FLAGS;
>
> ops[i].am_error = strncpy_from_user((char *)attr_name,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
> index 8b5acf8c42e1..720eb72f3be3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,11 @@ xfs_compat_attrmulti_by_handle(
>
> error = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < am_hreq.opcount; i++) {
> + if ((ops[i].am_flags & ATTR_ROOT) &&
> + (ops[i].am_flags & ATTR_SECURE)) {
> + ops[i].am_error = -EINVAL;
> + continue;
> + }
> ops[i].am_flags &= ATTR_KERNEL_FLAGS;
>
> ops[i].am_error = strncpy_from_user((char *)attr_name,
> --
> 2.20.1
>
