Re: [RFC-PATCH] xfs: do not update sunit/swidth in the superblock to match those provided during mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can we all take a little step back and think about the implications
of the original patch from Alex?  Because I think there is very little.
And updated sunit/swidth is just a little performance optimization,
and anyone who really cares about changing that after the fact can
trivially add those to fstab.

So I think something like his original patch plus a message during
mount that the new values are not persisted should be perfectly fine.

We can still make xfs_repair smarter about guessing the root inode
of course.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux