Re: [PATCH] xfs_scrub: fix complaint about uninitialized ret

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/7/19 3:30 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Coverity complained about the uninitialized ret in run_scrub_phases.
> It's not sophisticated enough to realize that phase 1 and 7 are both
> marked mustrun and are never the repair or datascan dummies and that
> therefore ret is always initialized by the end of the for loop, but
> OTOH there's no reason not to fix a trivial logic bomb if that ever
> changes.
> 
> Coverity-id: 1455255
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  scrub/xfs_scrub.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scrub/xfs_scrub.c b/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
> index a792768c..014c54dd 100644
> --- a/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
> +++ b/scrub/xfs_scrub.c
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ run_scrub_phases(
>  	unsigned int		debug_phase = 0;
>  	unsigned int		phase;
>  	int			rshift;
> -	int			ret;
> +	int			ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (debug_tweak_on("XFS_SCRUB_PHASE"))
>  		debug_phase = atoi(getenv("XFS_SCRUB_PHASE"));
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux