Re: [PATCH] xfs_io/lsattr: expose FS_XFLAG_HASATTR flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/6/19 12:29 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:03 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:58:55AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> For efficient check if file has xattrs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  io/attr.c | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/io/attr.c b/io/attr.c
>>> index b713d017..ba88ef16 100644
>>> --- a/io/attr.c
>>> +++ b/io/attr.c
>>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct xflags {
>>>       { FS_XFLAG_FILESTREAM,          "S", "filestream"       },
>>>       { FS_XFLAG_DAX,                 "x", "dax"              },
>>>       { FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE,          "C", "cowextsize"       },
>>> +     { FS_XFLAG_HASATTR,             "X", "has-xattr"        },
>>>       { 0, NULL, NULL }
>>>  };
>>>  #define CHATTR_XFLAG_LIST    "r"/*p*/"iasAdtPneEfSxC"
>>
>> /me wonders if this should have /*X*/ commented out the same way we do
>> for "p".
> 
> Sure. Eric, please let me know if you want a re-submit for this.

Ummm I'll just stage it now and add it so I don't forget

like:

#define CHATTR_XFLAG_LIST    "r"/*p*/"iasAdtPneEfS"/*X*/"xC"

that, right?

>>
>> Otherwise, the patch looks ok to me...
>>
>> /me *also* wonders how many filesystems fail to implement this flag but
>> support xattrs.
>>
>> Oh.  All of them.  Though I assume overlayfs is being patched... :)
>>
> 
> It doesn't need to be patched. It doesn't have xattr storage of its own.
> The ioctl is passed down to the underlying fs (*).
> (*) The ioctl is currently blocked on overlayfs directories.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux