Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: slightly tweak an assert in xfs_fs_map_blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:04:14AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We should never see delalloc blocks for a pNFS layout, write or not.
> Adjust the assert to check for that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> index c637f0192976..3634ffff3b07 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> @@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ xfs_fs_map_blocks(
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
> +	ASSERT(!nimaps || imap.br_startblock != DELAYSTARTBLOCK);
> +
>  	if (write) {
>  		enum xfs_prealloc_flags	flags = 0;
>  
> -		ASSERT(imap.br_startblock != DELAYSTARTBLOCK);
> -
>  		if (!nimaps || imap.br_startblock == HOLESTARTBLOCK) {
>  			/*
>  			 * xfs_iomap_write_direct() expects to take ownership of
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux