Hi all,
After merging the xfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/compat_ioctl.c: In function '__do_compat_sys_ioctl':
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1056:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1056 | case FICLONE:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1057:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1057 | case FICLONERANGE:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1058:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1058 | case FIDEDUPERANGE:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1059:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1059 | case FS_IOC_FIEMAP:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1062:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1062 | case FIBMAP:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1063:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1063 | case FIGETBSZ:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1064:2: error: case label not within a switch statement
1064 | case FIONREAD:
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1066:4: error: break statement not within loop or switch
1066 | break;
| ^~~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1069:2: error: 'default' label not within a switch statement
1069 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1078:3: error: break statement not within loop or switch
1078 | break;
| ^~~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1077:4: error: label 'do_ioctl' used but not defined
1077 | goto do_ioctl;
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1073:5: error: label 'out_fput' used but not defined
1073 | goto out_fput;
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1005:3: error: label 'out' used but not defined
1005 | goto out;
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1079:2: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
1079 | }
| ^
fs/compat_ioctl.c: At top level:
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1081:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if'
1081 | if (compat_ioctl_check_table(XFORM(cmd)))
| ^~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1084:2: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
1084 | error = do_ioctl_trans(cmd, arg, f.file);
| ^~~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1084:2: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'error' [-Werror=implicit-int]
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1084:25: error: 'cmd' undeclared here (not in a function)
1084 | error = do_ioctl_trans(cmd, arg, f.file);
| ^~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1084:30: error: 'arg' undeclared here (not in a function)
1084 | error = do_ioctl_trans(cmd, arg, f.file);
| ^~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1084:35: error: 'f' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'fd'?
1084 | error = do_ioctl_trans(cmd, arg, f.file);
| ^
| fd
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1085:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if'
1085 | if (error == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
| ^~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1088:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'goto'
1088 | goto out_fput;
| ^~~~
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1090:15: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
1090 | found_handler:
| ^
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1092:10: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
1092 | do_ioctl:
| ^
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1094:10: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
1094 | out_fput:
| ^
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1096:5: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
1096 | out:
| ^
fs/compat_ioctl.c:1098:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
1098 | }
| ^
fs/compat_ioctl.c:976:12: warning: 'compat_ioctl_check_table' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
976 | static int compat_ioctl_check_table(unsigned int xcmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
d5e20bfa0b77 ("fs: add generic UNRESVSP and ZERO_RANGE ioctl handlers")
I have used the xfs tree from next-20191028 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpJLTttR8l9M.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
