Re: [PATCH REPOST 0/2] xfs: rely on minleft instead of total for bmbt res

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:32:21AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a repost of a couple patches I posted a few months ago[1]. There
> are no changes other than a rebase to for-next. Any thoughts on these? I
> think Carlos had also run into some related generic/223 failures fairly
> recently...
> 
> Carlos,
> 
> Any chance you could give these a try?

Any progress on this in the last month?  I /think/ this is related to
the unaligned allocations that Dan's complaining about this morning.

--D

> Brian
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20190501140504.16435-1-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Brian Foster (2):
>   xfs: drop minlen before tossing alignment on bmap allocs
>   xfs: don't set bmapi total block req where minleft is sufficient
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c   |  4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c       |  4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c       |  4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c     |  4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c     |  3 +--
>  6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux