On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:11:52AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Is the command supposed to deal with the on-disk or in-memory nodes? > > The ones your quote are the in-memory btrees, but the file seems > > (the way I read it, the documentation seems to be lacking) with the > > on-disk btrees. > > It started as a command for calculating ondisk btree geometry but then > we were discussing the iext tree geometry on irc so I extended it to > handle that too. I think mixing the on-disk trees an an in-memory structure in the same command is a really bad idea. In fact I'm not sure what use the calculation for the iext tree is. It is an implementation detail that can (and did) change from release to release, unlike the other trees that not going to change without an on-disk format change.
