Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_db: btheight should check geometry more carefully

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:40:53PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The btheight command needs to check user-supplied geometry more
> carefully so that we don't hit floating point exceptions.
> 
> Coverity-id: 1453661, 1453659
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  

Patch looks good, but.


> +	if (record_size > blocksize) {
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +			_("%s: record size must be less than %u bytes.\n"),

	Couldn't this message maybe be better saying "less than current blocksize"?
	Saying it is less than X bytes sounds kind of meaningless, requiring a
	trip to the code to understand what exactly 'bytes' mean here.

	Maybe something like:

	_("%s: record size must be less than current block size (%u).\n"),


Same for the next two.

> +			tag, blocksize);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (key_size > blocksize) {
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +			_("%s: key size must be less than %u bytes.\n"),
> +			tag, blocksize);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ptr_size > blocksize) {
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +			_("%s: pointer size must be less than %u bytes.\n"),
> +			tag, blocksize);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	p = strtok(NULL, ":");
>  	if (p) {
>  		fprintf(stderr,
> @@ -211,13 +244,24 @@ report(
>  	int			ret;
>  
>  	ret = construct_records_per_block(tag, blocksize, records_per_block);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		printf(_("%s: Unable to determine records per block.\n"),
> -				tag);
> +	if (ret)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (report_what & REPORT_MAX) {
> +		if (records_per_block[0] < 2) {
> +			fprintf(stderr,
> +_("%s: cannot calculate best case scenario due to leaf geometry underflow.\n"),
> +				tag);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (records_per_block[1] < 4) {
> +			fprintf(stderr,
> +_("%s: cannot calculate best case scenario due to node geometry underflow.\n"),
> +				tag);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
>  		printf(
>  _("%s: best case per %u-byte block: %u records (leaf) / %u keyptrs (node)\n"),
>  				tag, blocksize, records_per_block[0],
> @@ -230,6 +274,20 @@ _("%s: best case per %u-byte block: %u records (leaf) / %u keyptrs (node)\n"),
>  		records_per_block[0] /= 2;
>  		records_per_block[1] /= 2;
>  
> +		if (records_per_block[0] < 1) {
> +			fprintf(stderr,
> +_("%s: cannot calculate worst case scenario due to leaf geometry underflow.\n"),
> +				tag);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (records_per_block[1] < 2) {
> +			fprintf(stderr,
> +_("%s: cannot calculate worst case scenario due to node geometry underflow.\n"),
> +				tag);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
>  		printf(
>  _("%s: worst case per %u-byte block: %u records (leaf) / %u keyptrs (node)\n"),
>  				tag, blocksize, records_per_block[0],
> @@ -284,8 +342,26 @@ btheight_f(
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (argc == optind || blocksize <= 0 || blocksize > INT_MAX ||
> -	    nr_records == 0) {
> +	if (nr_records == 0) {
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +_("Number of records must be greater than zero.\n"));
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (blocksize > INT_MAX) {
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +_("The largest block size this command will consider is %u bytes.\n"),
> +			INT_MAX);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (blocksize < 128) {
> +		fprintf(stderr,
> +_("The smallest block size this command will consider is 128 bytes.\n"));
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (argc == optind) {
>  		btheight_help();
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> 

-- 
Carlos





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux