On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 06:47:44PM +0530, Aliasgar Surti wrote: > From: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@xxxxxxxxx> > > Returned value directly instead of using variable as it wasn't updated. > > Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@xxxxxxxxx> Looks ok, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > fs/xfs/scrub/alloc.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/alloc.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/alloc.c > index a43d181..5533e48 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/alloc.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/alloc.c > @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ xchk_allocbt_rec( > xfs_agnumber_t agno = bs->cur->bc_private.a.agno; > xfs_agblock_t bno; > xfs_extlen_t len; > - int error = 0; > > bno = be32_to_cpu(rec->alloc.ar_startblock); > len = be32_to_cpu(rec->alloc.ar_blockcount); > @@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ xchk_allocbt_rec( > > xchk_allocbt_xref(bs->sc, bno, len); > > - return error; > + return 0; > } > > /* Scrub the freespace btrees for some AG. */ > -- > 2.7.4 >
