Re: question of xfs/148 and xfs/149

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[add linux-xfs to cc]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:00:57AM +0000, Xu, Yang wrote:
> HI All
> 
> When I investigated xfs/030 failure on upstream kernel after mering
> xfstests commit d0e484ac699f ("check: wipe scratch devices between
> tests"), I found two similar cases(xfs/148,xfs/149).
> 
> xfs/148 is a clone of test 030 using xfs_prepair64 instead of xfs_repair.
> xfs/149 is a clone of test 031 using xfs_prepair instead of xfs_repair
> 
> But I don't find these two commands and know nothing about them.  If
> these commands have been obsoleted long time ago, I think we can
> remove the two cases. Or may I miss something?

<shrug> I think your analysis is correct, but let's see what the xfs
list thinks.

--D

> 
> Thanks
> Yang Xu
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux