Re: [PATCH 1/2] common: check if a given rename flag is supported in _requires_renameat2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019/9/14 1:36, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:15:16PM +0800, kaixuxia wrote:
>> Some testcases may require a special rename flag, such as RENAME_WHITEOUT,
>> so add support check for if a given rename flag is supported in
>> _requires_renameat2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: kaixuxia <kaixuxia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> Looks mostly reasonable...
> 
>>  common/renameat2  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  tests/generic/024 | 13 +++----------
>>  tests/generic/025 | 13 +++----------
>>  tests/generic/078 | 13 +++----------
>>  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/renameat2 b/common/renameat2
>> index f8d6d4f..7bb81e0 100644
>> --- a/common/renameat2
>> +++ b/common/renameat2
>> @@ -103,10 +103,47 @@ _rename_tests()
>>  #
>>  _requires_renameat2()
>>  {
>> +	local flags=$1
>> +	local rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> +
>>  	if test ! -x src/renameat2; then
>>  		_notrun "renameat2 binary not found"
>>  	fi
>> -	if ! src/renameat2 -t; then
>> -		_notrun "kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall"
>> +
>> +	if test -z "$flags"; then
>> +		src/renameat2 -t
>> +		[ $? -eq 0 ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall"
>> +		return
>>  	fi
>> +
>> +	case $flags in
>> +	"noreplace")
>> +		mkdir $rename_dir
>> +		touch $rename_dir/foo
>> +		if ! src/renameat2 -t -n $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; then
>> +			rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; rmdir $rename_dir
>> +			_notrun "fs doesn't support RENAME_NOREPLACE"
>> +		fi
>> +		;;
>> +	"exchange")
>> +		mkdir $rename_dir
>> +		touch $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> +		if ! src/renameat2 -t -x $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; then
>> +			rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; rmdir $rename_dir
>> +			_notrun "fs doesn't support RENAME_EXCHANGE"
>> +		fi
>> +		;;
>> +	"whiteout")
>> +		mkdir $rename_dir
>> +		touch $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> +		if ! src/renameat2 -t -w $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; then
>> +			rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; rmdir $rename_dir
>> +			_notrun "fs doesn't support RENAME_WHITEOUT"
>> +		fi
>> +		;;
>> +	*)
>> +		_notrun "only support noreplace,exchange,whiteout rename flags, please check."
>> +		;;
>> +	esac
> 
> ... but it seems like this could be simplified to reduce (duplicate)
> code. For example:
> 
> 	mkdir $rename_dir
> 	touch $rename_dir/foo
> 	cmd=""
> 	case $flags in
> 	"noreplace")
> 		cmd="-n $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar"
> 		;;
> 	"exchange")
> 		touch $rename_dir/bar
> 		cmd="-x $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar"
> 		;;
> 	"whiteout")
> 		touch $rename_dir/bar
> 		cmd="-w $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar"
> 		;;
> 	...
> 	if ! src/renameat2 -t $cmd; then
> 		rm -rf $rename_dir
> 		_notrun "fs doesn't support renameat2"
> 	fi
> 	rm -rf $rename_dir
> 
> Hm?
> 
Yeah, make more sense.

> Brian
> 
>> +	rm -fr $rename_dir
>>  }
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/024 b/tests/generic/024
>> index 2888c66..9c1161a 100755
>> --- a/tests/generic/024
>> +++ b/tests/generic/024
>> @@ -29,20 +29,13 @@ _supported_fs generic
>>  _supported_os Linux
>>  
>>  _require_test
>> -_requires_renameat2
>> +_requires_renameat2 noreplace
>>  _require_test_symlinks
>>  
>> -rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> -mkdir $rename_dir
>> -touch $rename_dir/foo
>> -if ! src/renameat2 -t -n $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; then
>> -    rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; rmdir $rename_dir
>> -    _notrun "fs doesn't support RENAME_NOREPLACE"
>> -fi
>> -rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> -
>>  # real QA test starts here
>>  
>> +rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> +mkdir $rename_dir
>>  _rename_tests $rename_dir -n
>>  rmdir $rename_dir
>>  
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/025 b/tests/generic/025
>> index 0310efa..1ee9ad6 100755
>> --- a/tests/generic/025
>> +++ b/tests/generic/025
>> @@ -29,20 +29,13 @@ _supported_fs generic
>>  _supported_os Linux
>>  
>>  _require_test
>> -_requires_renameat2
>> +_requires_renameat2 exchange
>>  _require_test_symlinks
>>  
>> -rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> -mkdir $rename_dir
>> -touch $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> -if ! src/renameat2 -t -x $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; then
>> -    rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; rmdir $rename_dir
>> -    _notrun "fs doesn't support RENAME_EXCHANGE"
>> -fi
>> -rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> -
>>  # real QA test starts here
>>  
>> +rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> +mkdir $rename_dir
>>  _rename_tests $rename_dir -x
>>  rmdir $rename_dir
>>  
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/078 b/tests/generic/078
>> index 9608574..37f3201 100755
>> --- a/tests/generic/078
>> +++ b/tests/generic/078
>> @@ -29,20 +29,13 @@ _supported_fs generic
>>  _supported_os Linux
>>  
>>  _require_test
>> -_requires_renameat2
>> +_requires_renameat2 whiteout
>>  _require_test_symlinks
>>  
>> -rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> -mkdir $rename_dir
>> -touch $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> -if ! src/renameat2 -t -w $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; then
>> -    rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar; rmdir $rename_dir
>> -    _notrun "fs doesn't support RENAME_WHITEOUT"
>> -fi
>> -rm -f $rename_dir/foo $rename_dir/bar
>> -
>>  # real QA test starts here
>>  
>> +rename_dir=$TEST_DIR/$$
>> +mkdir $rename_dir
>>  _rename_tests $rename_dir -w
>>  rmdir $rename_dir
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> -- 
>> kaixuxia

-- 
kaixuxia



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux