Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: fix inode fork extent count overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: fix inode fork extent count overflow
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:55:51 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zlang@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190911012107.26553-1-david@fromorbit.com>
References: <20190911012107.26553-1-david@fromorbit.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

... and there went my hopes to eventually squeeze xfs_ifork into
a single 64-byte cacheline.  But the analys looks sensible.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: fix inode fork extent count overflow
  - From: Dave Chinner

References:
- [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: fix inode fork extent count overflow
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 16/19] RDMA/uverbs: Add back pointer to system file object
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] xfstests: add deadlock between the AGI and AGF with RENAME_WHITEOUT test
Previous by thread: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: fix inode fork extent count overflow
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: fix inode fork extent count overflow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux