Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: fix missed wakeup on l_flush_wait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:47:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The code in xlog_wait uses the spinlock to make adding the task to
> the wait queue, and setting the task state to UNINTERRUPTIBLE atomic
> with respect to the waker.
> 
> Doing the wakeup after releasing the spinlock opens up the following
> race condition:
> 
> Task 1					task 2
> add task to wait queue
> 					wake up task
> set task state to UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> 
> This issue was found through code inspection as a result of kworkers
> being observed stuck in UNINTERRUPTIBLE state with an empty
> wait queue. It is rare and largely unreproducable.
> 
> Simply moving the spin_unlock to after the wake_up_all results
> in the waker not being able to see a task on the waitqueue before
> it has set its state to UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
> 
> This bug dates back to the conversion of this code to generic
> waitqueue infrastructure from a counting semaphore back in 2008
> which didn't place the wakeups consistently w.r.t. to the relevant
> spin locks.
> 
> [dchinner: Also fix a similar issue in the shutdown path on
> xc_commit_wait. Update commit log with more details of the issue.]
> 
> Fixes: d748c62367eb ("[XFS] Convert l_flushsema to a sv_t")
> Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks ok to me,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index 5e21450fb8f5..8380ed065608 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -2644,7 +2644,6 @@ xlog_state_do_callback(
>  	int		   funcdidcallbacks; /* flag: function did callbacks */
>  	int		   repeats;	/* for issuing console warnings if
>  					 * looping too many times */
> -	int		   wake = 0;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&log->l_icloglock);
>  	first_iclog = iclog = log->l_iclog;
> @@ -2840,11 +2839,9 @@ xlog_state_do_callback(
>  #endif
>  
>  	if (log->l_iclog->ic_state & (XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE|XLOG_STATE_IOERROR))
> -		wake = 1;
> -	spin_unlock(&log->l_icloglock);
> -
> -	if (wake)
>  		wake_up_all(&log->l_flush_wait);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&log->l_icloglock);
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -3944,7 +3941,9 @@ xfs_log_force_umount(
>  	 * item committed callback functions will do this again under lock to
>  	 * avoid races.
>  	 */
> +	spin_lock(&log->l_cilp->xc_push_lock);
>  	wake_up_all(&log->l_cilp->xc_commit_wait);
> +	spin_unlock(&log->l_cilp->xc_push_lock);
>  	xlog_state_do_callback(log, true, NULL);
>  
>  #ifdef XFSERRORDEBUG
> -- 
> 2.23.0.rc1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux