Hi Linus, On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:28:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:55 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ...which is clearly caused by xfs_setattr_nonsize failing to unlock the > > ILOCK after the xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve call fails. Add the missing > > unlock. > > Thanks for the quick fix. > > I assume there's no real embargo on this, and we can just add it asap > to the xfs tree and mark it for stable, rather than do anything > outside the usual development path? > > The security list rules do allow for a 5-working-day delay, but this > being "just" a local DoS thing I expect nobody really will argue for > it. > > Anybody? Agreed, there is no real embargo on this, it is public anyway on the xfs list and actually we just wanted to be on the safe side by asking or bringing it to security@k.o. Thanks for the quick fix. Regards, Salvatore
