On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 02:45:36PM +0800, kaixuxia wrote:
> On 2019/8/19 23:13, Brian Foster wrote:
> > /* error checks before we dirty the transaction */
> > if (!target_ip && !spaceres) {
> > error = xfs_dir_canenter();
> > ...
> > } else if (S_ISDIR() && !(empty || nlink > 2))
> > error = -EEXIST;
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > if (wip) {
> > ...
> > xfs_iunlink_remove();
> > }
> >
> > if (!target_ip) {
> > xfs_dir_create();
> > ...
> > } else {
> > xfs_dir_replace();
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > ... but that may not be any cleaner..? It could also be done as a
> > followup cleanup patch as well.
>
> Yep, it is cleaner that making the whole check before the transaction
> becomes dirty, just return the error code if check failed and
> the filesystem is clean.
*nod*
> Dave gave another solution in the other subthread that using
> XFS_DIR3_FT_WHT, it's a bit more work for this bug, include
> refactoring the xfs_rename() and xfs_lookup(), not sure whether
> it's worth the complex changes for this bug.
It's not necessary to fix the bug, but it's somethign we should
be looking to do because it makes whiteout handling a lot more
efficient - it's just dirent modifications at that point, no inodes
are necessary.
This is how I always intended to handle whiteouts - it's just
another thing on the "we need to fix" list....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
