On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 10:52:49PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:17:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The XFS inode item slab actually reclaimed by inode shrinker > > callbacks from the memory reclaim subsystem. These should be marked > > as reclaimable so the mm subsystem has the full picture of how much > > memory it can actually reclaim from the XFS slab caches. > > Looks good, > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Btw, I wonder if we should just kill off our KM_ZONE_* defined. They > just make it a little harder to figure out what is actually going on > without a real benefit. Yeah, they don't serve much purpose now, it might be worth cleaning up. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
