On 8/5/19 1:31 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/5/19 11:31 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 8/5/19 11:15 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> Hi Damien,
>>>
>>> I noticed a regression in xfs/747 (an unreleased xfstest for the
>>> xfs_scrub media scanning feature) on 5.3-rc3. I'll condense that down
>>> to a simpler reproducer:
>>>
>>> # dmsetup table
>>> error-test: 0 209 linear 8:48 0
>>> error-test: 209 1 error
>>> error-test: 210 6446894 linear 8:48 210
>>>
>>> Basically we have a ~3G /dev/sdd and we set up device mapper to fail IO
>>> for sector 209 and to pass the io to the scsi device everywhere else.
>>>
>>> On 5.3-rc3, performing a directio pread of this range with a < 1M buffer
>>> (in other words, a request for fewer than MAX_BIO_PAGES bytes) yields
>>> EIO like you'd expect:
>>>
>>> # strace -e pread64 xfs_io -d -c 'pread -b 1024k 0k 1120k' /dev/mapper/error-test
>>> pread64(3, 0x7f880e1c7000, 1048576, 0) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
>>> pread: Input/output error
>>> +++ exited with 0 +++
>>>
>>> But doing it with a larger buffer succeeds(!):
>>>
>>> # strace -e pread64 xfs_io -d -c 'pread -b 2048k 0k 1120k' /dev/mapper/error-test
>>> pread64(3, "XFSB\0\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\fL\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1146880, 0) = 1146880
>>> read 1146880/1146880 bytes at offset 0
>>> 1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0009 sec (1.124 GiB/sec and 1052.6316 ops/sec)
>>> +++ exited with 0 +++
>>>
>>> (Note that the part of the buffer corresponding to the dm-error area is
>>> uninitialized)
>>>
>>> On 5.3-rc2, both commands would fail with EIO like you'd expect. The
>>> only change between rc2 and rc3 is commit 0eb6ddfb865c ("block: Fix
>>> __blkdev_direct_IO() for bio fragments").
>>>
>>> AFAICT we end up in __blkdev_direct_IO with a 1120K buffer, which gets
>>> split into two bios: one for the first BIO_MAX_PAGES worth of data (1MB)
>>> and a second one for the 96k after that.
>>>
>>> I think the problem is that every time we submit a bio, we increase ret
>>> by the size of that bio, but at the time we do that we have no idea if
>>> the bio is going to succeed or not. At the end of the function we do:
>>>
>>> if (!ret)
>>> ret = blk_status_to_errno(dio->bio.bi_status);
>>>
>>> Which means that we only pick up the IO error if we haven't already set
>>> ret. I suppose that was useful for being able to return a short read,
>>> but now that we always increment ret by the size of the bio, we act like
>>> the whole buffer was read. I tried a -rc2 kernel and found that 40% of
>>> the time I'd get an EIO and the rest of the time I got a short read.
>>>
>>> Not sure where to go from here, but something's not right...
>>
>> I'll take a look.
>
> How about this? The old code did:
>
> if (!ret)
> ret = blk_status_to_errno(dio->bio.bi_status);
> if (likely(!ret))
> ret = dio->size;
>
> where 'ret' was just tracking the error. With 'ret' now being the
> positive IO size, we should overwrite it if ret is >= 0, not just if
> it's zero.
>
> Also kill a use-after-free.
This should be better, we don't want to override 'ret' is bio->bi_status
doesn't indicate an error.
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index a6f7c892cb4a..1ac89f4fcbcc 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int nr_pages)
ret = 0;
for (;;) {
+ ssize_t this_size;
int err;
bio_set_dev(bio, bdev);
@@ -433,13 +434,14 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int nr_pages)
polled = true;
}
+ this_size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
qc = submit_bio(bio);
if (qc == BLK_QC_T_EAGAIN) {
if (!ret)
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto error;
}
- ret = dio->size;
+ ret += this_size;
if (polled)
WRITE_ONCE(iocb->ki_cookie, qc);
@@ -460,13 +462,14 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int nr_pages)
atomic_inc(&dio->ref);
}
+ this_size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
qc = submit_bio(bio);
if (qc == BLK_QC_T_EAGAIN) {
if (!ret)
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto error;
}
- ret = dio->size;
+ ret += this_size;
bio = bio_alloc(gfp, nr_pages);
if (!bio) {
@@ -494,7 +497,7 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int nr_pages)
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
out:
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && dio->bio.bi_status)
ret = blk_status_to_errno(dio->bio.bi_status);
bio_put(&dio->bio);
--
Jens Axboe
