Re: [PATCH] xfs: Do not free xfs_extent_busy from inside a spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> CC'ing Jeff so he can maybe chime in too.
> 
> 
> > Er, what problem does this solve?  Does holding on to the pag spinlock
> > too long while memory freeing causes everything else to stall?  When is
> > memory freeing slow enough to cause a noticeable impact?
> 
> Jeff detected it when using this patch:
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=156388753722881&w=2
> 
> At first I don't see any specific problem, but I don't think we are supposed to
> use kmem_free() inside interrupt context anyway. So, even though there is no
> visible side effect, it should be fixed IMHO. With the patch above, the side
> effect is a bunch of warnings :P

This is going to break lots of places in xfs.  While we have separate
allocation side wrappers for plain kmalloc vs using a vmalloc fallback we
always use the same free side wrapper.  We could fix this by adding a
kmem_free_large and switch all places that allocated using
kmem_alloc_large to that, but it will require a bit of work.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux