Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: remove more ondisk directory corruption asserts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:49:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:46:40PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Continue our game of replacing ASSERTs for corrupt ondisk metadata with
> > EFSCORRUPTED returns.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c  |   19 ++++++++++++-------
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c |    3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> ...
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> > index 16731d2d684b..f7f3fb458019 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> > @@ -743,7 +743,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_for_entry(
> >  	ents = dp->d_ops->leaf_ents_p(leaf);
> >  
> >  	xfs_dir3_leaf_check(dp, bp);
> > -	ASSERT(leafhdr.count > 0);
> > +	if (leafhdr.count <= 0)
> > +		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> 
> This error return bubbles up to xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_int() and
> xfs_da3_node_lookup_int(). The latter has a direct return value as well
> as a *result return parameter, which unconditionally carries the return
> value from xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_int(). xfs_da3_node_lookup_int() has
> multiple callers, but a quick look at one (xfs_attr_node_addname())
> suggests we might not handle corruption errors properly via the *result
> parameter. Perhaps we also need to fix up xfs_da3_node_lookup_int() to
> return particular errors directly?

It would be a good idea to clean up the whole return value/*retval mess
in that function (and xfs_da3_path_shift where *retval came from) but
that quickly turned into a bigger cleanup of magic values and dual
returns, particularly since the dabtree shrinking code turns the
_path_shift *retval into yet another series of magic int numbers...

...so in the meantime this at least fixes the asserts I see when running
fuzz testing.  I'll look at the broader cleanup for 5.4.

--D

> 
> Brian
> 
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Look up the hash value in the leaf entries.
> > 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux